![]() ![]() There is a significant spec difference between these two cards (2GB vs 1GB memory 256 bit vs 128 bit bus 1536 vs 384 cores 128 vs 32 TMUs 32 vs 16 ROPS).īottom line, looks like my MacBook will run Mojave, but will I see such a significant impact on my graphics with the GT 650 that I'd be better off staying on High Sierra? I don't play games or do a ton of high-res video editing - what else might cause me issues?Īnd, yeah, I know this is an "ancient" MacBook, but I bought it new with every possible power/memory option and even 7 years later, it still has way more capability than I demand of it (plus the keyboard always works, it has built-in slots and ports, and the mag-safe connector has paid for itself many times over). Problem is that if I read further on Apples's Mojave compatibility page, it says the relevant supported video card is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition - my MacBook has the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M. Mid-2012 MacBook Pro and Mojave - yes or no? If I follow the Apple Support compatibility test and go to SysInfo/Graphics, I see "Metal: Supported, feature set macOS GPUFamily1v3". Please see what this Apple page says.ġ) CAN I upgrade to Mac OSX 10.14 Mojave on my mid 2012 Mac Book Pro, generally?Ģ) IF I do this upgrade, will I have a problem with Final Cut Pro? The Apple Website has conflicting information about whether or not I can upgrade to Mojave OX 10.14Īs the screen grab shows, both cards in my machine support Metal but the specific cards I have aren't in the approved apple list. I attach images of specs for the two graphics cards installed on the Mac Book Pro. I am trying to determine whether it is "safe" to upgrade the OS to 10.14 Mojave, without creating problems with Final Cut Pro.Ĭurrently Software Update is NOT offering me updates to either the OS (from my current 10.13.6) OR an update for Final Cut. ![]() I am currently running OS 10.13.6 High Sierra. The other benefit of the web driver is support for the Dell 5K display.Will Final Cut Pro 10.4.6 work on Mojave OSX 10.14 I have a Mac Book Pro 15 inch Mid 2012 machine. The Maxwell GPUs (GTX 970, 980, 980 Ti, TITAN X, Quadro K5000) do require the web driver. (NOTE: The web driver is not required for the GTX 680. In addition, for the first time, we were able to run Tomb Raider and Batman: Arkham City at 5120x2880 without crashing. We featured the apps that benefited the most from the new web driver. NVIDIA has been busy making improvements to the custom Yosemite web drivers. Consequently, in this case, it smoked the 980 (4G) and 680 (2G).Ĥ. The 980 Ti's 6GB of GDDR5 was fully utilized. ![]() The BruceX graph illustrates what happens when a pro app function consumes gobs of VRAM. OpenCL_OceanWave_Bandwidth benchmark revealed a big jump in OpenCL performance for the two Maxwell GPUs (980 and 980 Ti), thanks to the newest web driver.ģ. In fact, the 680 won the Dirt 3 'race.'Ģ. In the case of Dirt 3 and Tomb Raider, the 980 Ti and 980 did not dominate the 680. RED bar in graph indicates the FASTEST result.ġ. GTX980 346.01 = NVIDIA GTX 980 Web Driver 346.01.03f01 Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition Apple has also listed the following graphics cards that might also be compatible with macOS Mojave: AMD Radeon RX 560 AMD Radeon RX 570 AMD Radeon RX 580 AMD. We were so impressed with the improvements in performance over the older driver, we decided to feature results from both old and new driver while comparing it to the GTX 980 an GTX 680 Mac Edition. While we were testing the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, a new OS X 10.10.4 web driver was released by NVIDIA. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |